![]() So running that display as a standard, non-Retina display with standard graphical assets will probably make things uncomfortably small, while running it as a Retina display with Retina graphical assets will probably make things unnecessarily large. right in the middle of the two display setups that Apple has optimized their OS to use. The problem is that a 27" 4K display gives you a pixel density of 163 ppi, i.e. Retina displays use pixel densities of 200-220 ppi. The reason is that macOS when using standard graphical assets targets a pixel density of 100-110 pixels per inch - which is why Apple had displays like 23" 1920x1200 and 30" 2560x1600 on the desktop side, with slightly higher pixel densities being used on the laptop side since the assumption was that your viewing distance would be shorter. It's not really a great fit for anybody, but it's especially bad for Macs. A 27" 4K display just isn't a good fit for Macs. Building on my reply above, you may want to experiment to see what you think, but fyi I would recommend that you consider returning that U2720Q if you plan to use it primarily with a Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |